you are here:   / News & Insights / Engineering Advantage Blog / The Six P’s of Finite Element Analysis (Prior Planning Prevents Particularly Poor Performance)

# The Six P’s of Finite Element Analysis (Prior Planning Prevents Particularly Poor Performance)

September 1, 2013 By: Peter Barrett

When performing any finite element analysis project it is critical to plan your approach to ensure a success. The most important step is to have clear goals, including your expected results and the format in which these results will be presented. It is also critical to have a reasonable idea of what answers you expect to obtain. For example, one can perform a simple Stress = Force / Area calculation to estimate the anticipated stress value prior to performing any finite element analysis calculations. Having this data will reduce the chance of large scale errors, such as incorrect units. Other areas of planning your finite element analysis include: model and mesh size, material properties, element selection, connection types, and quantity and quality of result sets. Here is a brief checklist that provides a starting point which can be tailored to your individual analysis goals:

• Can symmetry and/or 2-d analyses be used? It is always better to solve the simplest model possible first. Additional complexity should be added incrementally. More accurate results can often be achieved by creating an independent local refined model and mapping the results via submodeling.
• Set a maximum degree of freedom value based on computational resources. For structural static analyses, as a rule of thumb, for each 100,000 degrees of freedom, a gigabyte of RAM is needed. For example, if you are using 3d shell elements that contain six degrees of freedom per node, a model of 200,000 nodes would require approximately 12 GB of memory.
• Anticipate the total element count through initial coarse meshing of a subset of the model. It is always more efficient to start simple with a coarse mesh and then refine the mesh in high stress areas. Creating a mapped mesh of lower order 3d brick elements with enhanced strain (extra shape functions) can reduce the solution time significantly and solve complex bending problems very accurately.
• Are large deflection effects required? Typically these are required when a component deforms more than half its thickness. If there is any doubt, turn them on. They can’t hurt. If the effects are insignificant, convergence will occur in the second iteration.
• Do I need to include nonlinear materials? If the design criteria does not allow material yield, there is no reason to include this effect in the model. If it is required, it is still helpful to run the linear analysis first for model checkout. It is generally recommended to isolate the regions where yielding will occur and refine the mesh to accurately predict the accumulated plastic strain.
• Do I need to include nonlinear contact? Running bonded contact first can help debug modeling issues. If the interface is in complete compression, the nonlinear contact might not be needed. Keeping some interfaces bonded can help assure that rigid body motion is prevented when nonlinear contact is active, and improve convergence speed.
• If the analysis requires multiple solutions, anticipate the quantity of results that will be produced by solving a single solution. For large models with lots of steps to be solved, it is often necessary to reduce the output by saving data at different intervals. For example, running a time history with 1500 design points, where each point requires 1Gb storage for results, would require 1.5 terabytes of disk space. If one stored the displacements at every step, but stresses only in the critical areas, and only every 3rd step, the same solution might produce a results files of less than a 100 GB.
• For modal analyses used to calculate the first few natural frequencies, the mesh can usually be coarse if only natural frequencies are required. These are proportional to the square root of the stiffness over the mass, and therefore relatively insensitive to mesh density. Be careful not to miss frequencies when using symmetry boundary conditions that can only predict symmetric modes. Also, be sure to define the mass density correctly and be aware that nonlinearities are not accounted for.

This is a short list of some guidelines for analysis planning and may need to be enhanced depending upon your application. The key to planning your finite element analysis is to start with the very simple analysis and slowly introduce complexity. Those that create the simple example problem that others “don’t have time to perform” will always reap the rewards of more accurate, on- time and under-budget finite element analysis projects!