Featured Case StudyThe Norsea Gas Terminal in Northern Germany plays a vital role in the connection of pipeline systems coming from the North Sea to the natural gas distribution network throughout Germany. Built in...Stay
- ANSYS Software
Featured Case StudyRelying on ANSYS Composite PrepPost helped EADS Innovation Works to develop lightweight composites in aircraft design. ANSYS Composite PrepPost provided simple pre- and post-processing of composite...Stay
- Resource Library
- News &
Composites Analysis - Needed from Fiber to Finished Form
Use of fiber reinforced composites as primary structure in a variety of engineering applications has grown very quickly over the past decade. In the not too distant past, my elder designer colleagues exclaimed composites were "black aluminum" or "rags and glue," when I mentioned the potential for using epoxy reinforced carbon, aramid, or glass fiber for a particular application.
Today, composite applications have become very broad-based and they are implemented successfully to solve design and performance challenges in aerospace, defense, civil, consumer, and many other industries. Use of composites is so common that my undergraduate engineering students are ordering off-the-shelf carbon fiber pre-form structural parts to be used for their senior design projects!
For many structural applications, it is generally agreed that composites can offer a lighter solution than conventional materials. However, the devil is in the details and often takes the form of proper analysis techniques, manufacturing processes, empirical performance correlation, and cost analysis.
As with any new technology development, composite analysis and simulation engineering tools must develop hand-in-hand with the new materials, manufactured forms, structural design methods, and physical testing. To create a robust design and make testing most efficient, analysis and assessment tools must be integrated in the design process from start to finish. Where composites have been implemented in a large scale, unexpected conditions or inaccurate analyses can cause significant unexpected costs of time and money, or even worse.
Different Analysis Goals, Different Simulation Approaches
Implementing finite element analysis into the design, test, and certification process has many advantages at all steps in the product life span. In each analysis we perform, we ask ourselves what is the goal, what information do I need, and how will this help?
Starting from the ground up, in terms of material characterization, many times, we are provided with basic strength and stiffness information from composite material providers. However, if we are starting with the micro-structure approach, we may need to use a simulation tool to characterize the thermal, electrical, and structural equivalent properties based on the constitutive materials and content.
A more global-level structural analysis approach incorporates specific part geometry and composite layup features. Finite element simulation and, more specifically, composite-dedicated pre and post processing tools, enhance the ability to set up the integrated analysis properly. We can then run large scale analysis models quickly to address our design requirements such as linear and non-linear static structural, buckling, or dynamic evaluations. We can also use these models to simulate attachment to other composite and non-composite parts through bonded or mechanically fastened joints.
The accuracy of the analysis in this integrated approach is highly dependent on capturing the finished product spatially-dependent fiber orientation and orthotropic material properties properly. Much of the recent software development is automating the design-specific analysis approaches for the variety of product forms used. My experience in using these integrated tools in analysis demonstrates we can tailor stiffness and strength on an individual part basis to optimize design. Some product forms available to us include traditional composite hand layups, fiber placement layups, pultrusion forming, and resin transfer molding (RTM) methods amongst others.
Failure, Composite Delamination, and Damage Assessment
In the concurrent design and analysis of parts, accompanying testing, and field usage, predictive failure assessment is critical for success. This phase links existing or potential load environment scenarios with empirical performance. In terms of FEA consulting, I have been fortunate enough to work on U.S. Army development programs to evaluate and implement analysis techniques considering improved product forms and material systems. We also investigated NDE inspection techniques looking at various methods of failure. We must often consider:
- Global and local failure modes
- Matrix failures - compression after impact (CAI), open hole tension/compression, interlaminar shear and normal stresses
- Fiber failures - tension, compression, buckling
- Core failures
CAE Associates suggests using a submodel approach or a more detailed local finite element model for evaluating failure mechanisms. Automated routines allow us to map the global model deformations on to a localized model as boundary conditions. The detailed results from these models provide improved information for critical interlaminar shear and normal stress failure evaluation.
Finite element analysis techniques can also help with the evaluation of fail-safe assessments of composite damage that may potentially exist. Much recent research and implementation in finite element based evaluation of degradation is demonstrated through techniques such as:
- Delamination using Cohesive Zone Material (CZM) simulation.
- Delamination using Virtual Crack Closure Techniques (VCCT).
- Progressive damage and degradation of the material system.
Finite element analysis codes have built-in routines that assess the above composite damage mechanisms or provide the flexibility of allowing users to program in custom material behavior models. CAE Associates has provided FEA services to write composite degradation methods in ANSYS through user subroutines such as USERMAT.
Some of the delamination simulation becomes challenging in terms of capturing the nonlinear behavior. More recently, techniques have been implemented to enhance convergence of nonlinear delamination problems.
How are you evaluating composite damage? (This topic alone is for a future post!)
From start to finish, various analysis approaches using finite element simulation play a valuable role in modern composite part engineering.
by: Chris Mesibov
by: Chris Mesibov
by: Chris Mesibov
by: Chris Mesibov
by: Peter Barrett
- Engineering Consulting
- ANSYS Software & Support
- ANSYS Training
- About Us
- News & Insights
1579 Straits Turnpike Suite 2B
Middlebury, CT 06762
- ANSYS Software